top of page
Search

Two New Deep Dives: John Carpenter and Stuart Gordon

  • Writer: Demeter Lorant
    Demeter Lorant
  • May 8
  • 3 min read

I recently published two longer CineCurious videos that mean a lot to me personally: one about John Carpenter, and one about Stuart Gordon.

Both of these filmmakers had a huge influence on the kind of films I love, the kind of stories I’m drawn to, and probably on the way I think about filmmaking in general. They are very different directors, but they share something important: they both created very distinct cinematic worlds, often outside the safest or most obvious paths.

And that is exactly why I wanted to make these videos.

John Carpenter: The Filmmaker Who Made Simplicity Feel Mythic

John Carpenter is one of those directors whose work feels instantly recognizable.

The widescreen compositions, the empty streets, the synth music, the sense that something terrible is slowly moving toward you, it’s all unmistakably Carpenter. His films can feel simple on the surface, but that simplicity is part of their power. He knew how to strip a story down to its strongest elements and let mood, rhythm, music, and character do the heavy lifting.

In the video, I wanted to look at Carpenter not just as the director of classics like Halloween, The Thing, Escape from New York, They Live, and Big Trouble in Little China, but as a filmmaker with a very specific voice. He was not just making horror, sci-fi, or action films. He was building little mythologies, stories about outsiders, antiheroes, paranoia, survival, and systems that cannot be trusted.

For me, Carpenter represents a kind of filmmaking that is very hard to fake. It’s clean, confident, atmospheric, and deeply cinematic. His work proves that you don’t always need enormous resources to create something iconic. You need taste, rhythm, a strong point of view, and the discipline to know what really matters in a scene.

That is something I keep coming back to as an indie filmmaker myself.


Stuart Gordon: Horror, Theatre, Lovecraft, and Beautiful Madness

The Stuart Gordon video is even more personal in a way.

Gordon’s films have always had a special place in my heart. There is something wonderfully strange, energetic, and fearless about his work. Films like Re-Animator, From Beyond, Dagon, Castle Freak, Dolls, and Robot Jox are not polished in the traditional Hollywood sense, and that is part of why I love them.

They feel alive.

Gordon came from theatre, and you can feel that in his films. The performances are big, the situations are intense, the ideas are often grotesque or absurd, but underneath the madness there is craft, intelligence, and real affection for the genre. He understood horror as something physical, funny, uncomfortable, and imaginative all at once.

Of course, his connection to H. P. Lovecraft is a big part of the video as well. Gordon helped bring Lovecraftian horror into cult cinema in a way that was messy, strange, funny, and unforgettable. He didn’t treat the material like a museum piece. He made it move, bleed, scream, and mutate.

And honestly, that’s probably why his films stuck with me so much.

There is also a personal connection in the video that I talk about more directly there, so I don’t want to over-explain it here. But let’s just say that Stuart Gordon’s work is tied to a certain kind of discovery for me, the feeling of finding films that are weird, bold, imperfect, and completely their own thing.

That kind of discovery stays with you.


Why These Videos Matter to Me

These deep dives take a lot of time to make. Researching the films, shaping the story, editing the clips, finding the rhythm, it’s always more work than it looks from the outside.

But with Carpenter and Gordon, it felt worth it because both of them represent something I really value: filmmakers who built their careers around personality, atmosphere, and instinct.

They didn’t just direct movies. They left behind a feeling.

Carpenter’s world is cold, precise, widescreen, cynical, and cool as hell. Gordon’s world is theatrical, bloody, grotesque, playful, and full of strange human energy. Both approaches are completely valid. Both are inspiring. And both remind me why I love genre filmmaking so much.

As someone who makes indie horror myself, I don’t watch these directors only as a fan. I also watch them as someone trying to learn. How do they create tension? How do they use limitations? How do they make something memorable without smoothing out all the rough edges?

That’s the kind of stuff I love digging into with CineCurious.

 
 
 

Comments


  • imdb-logo-nobackground
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
bottom of page